Which model should one use: the time-effects model or the linear trend model?
The time effects model (= year effects model in case the time points are years) estimates parameters for each separate year and should be chosen if you want to assess indices for each year. Choose the linear trend model if you are interested in testing whether a trend has happened across a number of years, by selecting one or more years as changepoints. The linear trend model should also be chosen when the data are too sparse to run the time effects model (see the FAQ about error messages). Using the linear trend model also allows testing trends before and after particular changepoints. Options are (1) to test trends before and after a priori selected changepoints or (2) to let TRIM search for the substantial changepoints by using the stepwise procedure.
If all years are selected as changepoints, the linear trend model is equivalent to the time effects model (although it results in a description in terms of trend slope parameters rather than time point parameters). Note that the linear trend model also produces indices for each year, but not necessarily based on yearly parameters as in the time effects model. Instead of yearly parameters, the linear trend uses the trend across a number of years to approximate the indices.
The linear model can be run without any changepoints selected. Thereby it imputes missing counts based on the trend over the whole period studied. Be careful in using the model without any changepoints; the resulting indices might be unrealistic.