Chlorophyll-a Trends in OSPAR Assessment Areas: Applying and Evaluating a New Statistical Approach

Annex I

Table I. COMP4 assessment results for SNS, RHPM, MPM, SCHPM1, SCHPM2, CFR, OC, and KC comparing the agreed method, combining EO and in-situ according to the area specific confidence rating (High 50:50, Moderate 70:30, and Low 90:10), and the proposed method.
Agreed methodProposed method
AreaPeriodTVChl-a (ug/L)EQRSStatusConfidence rating*Chl-a (ug/L)EQRSStatusConfidence rating
MPM2015-2020811,10,34PoorModerate9,70,43ModerateModerate
RHPM2015-20206,87,60,53ModerateHigh7,30,53ModerateModerate
SNS2015-20203,83,30,74GoodHigh3,00,83HighHigh
SCHPM22015-20208,911,00,43ModerateModerate11,10,41ModerateModerate
SCHPM12015-2020512,20,14BadModerate12,10,14BadModerate
CFR2015-20202,83,00,54ModerateModerate2,00,91HighHigh
KC2015-20201,22,00,25PoorHigh2,00,21PoorHigh
OC2015-20201,62,10,38PoorHigh1,90,46ModerateHigh
*Average in-situ confidence rating over the period 2015-2020, which determines the weighting when combining in-situ and EO data