Health and health care; personal characteristics, 2014-2021

Changed on: 31/07/2023 02:00

Health and health care; personal characteristics, 2014-2021
Characteristics persons	Margins	Periods	SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items General health Excellent (%)	SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items General health Very good (%)	SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items General health Good (%)	SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items General health Moderate (%)	SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items General health Bad (%)
Total	Value	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Value	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Value	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Value	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Value	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Value	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Value	2020	20.4	29.7	38.2	9.7	2.1
Total	Value	2021	19.2	30.6	38.5	9.6	2.1
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2020	19.5	28.6	37.1	9.0	1.8
Total	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2021	18.3	29.5	37.3	8.9	1.7
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2020	21.3	30.7	39.3	10.4	2.4
Total	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2021	20.2	31.8	39.7	10.3	2.5
Sex: Male	Value	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Value	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Value	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Value	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Value	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Value	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Value	2020	22.9	30.6	36.3	8.0	2.3
Sex: Male	Value	2021	22.2	31.3	36.7	8.0	1.9
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2020	21.5	29.1	34.7	7.1	1.9
Sex: Male	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2021	20.8	29.7	35.0	7.1	1.4
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2020	24.2	32.0	37.8	8.8	2.8
Sex: Male	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2021	23.7	32.9	38.4	9.0	2.4
Sex: Female	Value	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Value	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Value	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Value	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Value	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Value	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Value	2020	17.9	28.8	40.1	11.4	1.8
Sex: Female	Value	2021	16.4	30.0	40.2	11.1	2.3
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2020	16.7	27.3	38.5	10.4	1.4
Sex: Female	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2021	15.2	28.5	38.6	10.0	1.8
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2020	19.1	30.2	41.6	12.4	2.3
Sex: Female	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2021	17.6	31.6	41.9	12.3	2.9
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2020	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Value	2021	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2020	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Lower bound 95% confidence interval	2021	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2018	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2019	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2020	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 0 to 3 years	Upper bound 95% confidence interval	2021	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 4 to 11 years	Value	2014	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 4 to 11 years	Value	2015	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 4 to 11 years	Value	2016	.	.	.	.	.
Age: 4 to 11 years	Value	2017	.	.	.	.	.
Source: CBS.

Explanation of symbols

Dataset is not available.

This table contains data on the perceived state of health and on contacts with providers of medical care of the Dutch population in private households. These data can be grouped by several personal characteristics.

Data available for 2014-2021

Status of the data: final.

Changes as of July 31, 2023:
None, the table has been discontinued.

When will new data be published?
Not applicable. This table has been replaced, see paragraph 3 for a link to the new table.

Description topics

SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older

The 'Short Format 12' or SF-12 questionnaire is a selection of 12 questions from the SF-36 (Ware et al., 1995 *). The SF-12 is a widely used international standard of a generic health measure. The SF-12 measures eight health aspects, namely physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, physical pain, general health, vitality (energy / fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. Based on the 12 questions, two partial scales can be calculated; a summary measure for physical health (norm score physical) and a summary measure for psychological health (norm score psychological).
These norm scores are calculated for people aged 12 or older.
*Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Second Edition, 1995.

Separate items

General health

The following question was asked to respondents aged 12 or older: Overall, what do you think about your health?
1. Excellent
2. Very good
3. Good
4. Moderate
5. Bad
This question is asked in the health survey because it is an item of the SF-12. The question is used to calculate the norm score physically and psychologically. Elsewhere in this Statline table are figures on ‘perceived health; good or very good’. For those figures, use was made of another question with different answer options, namely: How is your health / the health of your child in general?
1. Very good
2. Good
3. OK
4. Bad
5. Very bad

Excellent: Percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered ’excellent’ to the question ’Overall, how do you feel about your health?’

Very good: Percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered ‘very good’ to the question ‘Overall, how do you feel about your health?’

Good: Percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered ‘good’ to the question ’Overall, how do you feel about your health?’

Moderate: Percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered ‘moderate’ to the question ‘Overall, how do you feel about your health?’

Bad: Percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered ’bad’ to the question ’Overall, how do you feel about your health?’