Health and health care; personal characteristics, 2014-2021
Characteristics persons | Margins | Periods | Medical contacts Persons receiving home care (%) | Medical contacts Persons with care abroad (%) | Informal care Informal care, 16 years or older Informal care receiver (%) | Informal care Informal care, 16 years or older Hours of informal care per week (hours) | Informal care Informal care, 55 years or older Informal care receiver (%) | Informal care Informal care, 55 years or older Hours of informal care per week (%) | SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items Emotional problem: less carefully Yes (%) | SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older Separate items Emotional problem: less carefully No (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | Value | 2014 | 6.1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Total | Value | 2015 | 5.9 | 3.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Total | Value | 2016 | 5.7 | 3.0 | 5.7 | 16.6 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Value | 2017 | 5.8 | 3.3 | 5.6 | 17.4 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Value | 2018 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 5.6 | 14.6 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Value | 2019 | 6.0 | . | . | . | 10.4 | 17.9 | . | . |
Total | Value | 2020 | 6.2 | . | . | . | 8.7 | 19.2 | 12.9 | 87.1 |
Total | Value | 2021 | 5.7 | . | . | . | 7.6 | 20.8 | 15.0 | 85.0 |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 5.6 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 5.5 | 3.0 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 5.2 | 13.7 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 14.4 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 5.4 | 2.9 | 5.1 | 12.3 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 5.6 | . | . | . | 9.4 | 14.4 | . | . |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 5.7 | . | . | . | 7.6 | 14.5 | 12.2 | 86.3 |
Total | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 5.2 | . | . | . | 6.6 | 15.3 | 14.1 | 84.1 |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 6.6 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 6.4 | 3.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 6.2 | 3.3 | 6.2 | 19.5 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 20.4 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 6.1 | 16.9 | . | . | . | . |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 6.5 | . | . | . | 11.5 | 21.4 | . | . |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 6.7 | . | . | . | 9.7 | 23.8 | 13.7 | 87.8 |
Total | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 6.2 | . | . | . | 8.8 | 26.4 | 15.9 | 85.9 |
Sex: Male | Value | 2014 | 3.8 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Value | 2015 | 3.8 | 2.9 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Value | 2016 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 3.7 | 23.1 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Value | 2017 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 22.0 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Value | 2018 | 3.7 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 18.2 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Value | 2019 | 4.0 | . | . | . | 7.3 | 16.0 | . | . |
Sex: Male | Value | 2020 | 4.3 | . | . | . | 6.8 | 29.7 | 10.1 | 89.9 |
Sex: Male | Value | 2021 | 3.7 | . | . | . | 4.7 | . | 11.8 | 88.2 |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 3.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 3.3 | 2.4 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 16.6 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 3.3 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 15.1 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 3.1 | 2.7 | 3.1 | 13.4 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 3.5 | . | . | . | 5.9 | 11.2 | . | . |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 3.7 | . | . | . | 5.5 | 20.0 | 9.2 | 88.9 |
Sex: Male | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 3.1 | . | . | . | 3.7 | . | 10.7 | 87.0 |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 4.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 4.4 | 3.4 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 4.2 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 29.7 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 28.9 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 23.0 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 4.6 | . | . | . | 8.6 | 20.8 | . | . |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 4.9 | . | . | . | 8.2 | 39.4 | 11.1 | 90.8 |
Sex: Male | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 4.3 | . | . | . | 5.9 | . | 13.0 | 89.3 |
Sex: Female | Value | 2014 | 8.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Value | 2015 | 8.0 | 3.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Value | 2016 | 7.7 | 3.6 | 7.6 | 13.5 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Value | 2017 | 7.7 | 3.1 | 7.3 | 15.2 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Value | 2018 | 8.0 | 3.3 | 7.5 | 12.9 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Value | 2019 | 8.0 | . | . | . | 13.4 | 18.9 | . | . |
Sex: Female | Value | 2020 | 8.1 | . | . | . | 10.4 | 13.0 | 15.6 | 84.4 |
Sex: Female | Value | 2021 | 7.7 | . | . | . | 10.4 | 17.3 | 18.1 | 81.9 |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 7.6 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 7.3 | 3.2 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 6.9 | 3.0 | 6.8 | 10.6 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 7.0 | 2.7 | 6.5 | 12.2 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 7.2 | 2.8 | 6.7 | 10.4 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 7.3 | . | . | . | 11.8 | 14.2 | . | . |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 7.3 | . | . | . | 8.8 | 8.6 | 14.5 | 83.2 |
Sex: Female | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 6.8 | . | . | . | 8.8 | 11.3 | 16.7 | 80.5 |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 9.1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 8.8 | 4.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 8.5 | 4.1 | 8.5 | 16.5 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 8.4 | 3.6 | 8.1 | 18.2 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 8.7 | 3.8 | 8.3 | 15.3 | . | . | . | . |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 8.8 | . | . | . | 15.1 | 23.5 | . | . |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 8.9 | . | . | . | 11.9 | 17.3 | 16.8 | 85.5 |
Sex: Female | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 8.6 | . | . | . | 12.3 | 23.2 | 19.5 | 83.3 |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2014 | 4.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2015 | 3.9 | 5.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2016 | 6.2 | 4.9 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2017 | 2.5 | 3.1 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2018 | 4.9 | 3.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2019 | 2.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2020 | 4.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Value | 2021 | 2.3 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 2.6 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 2.0 | 3.1 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 3.8 | 2.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 1.0 | 1.4 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 2.8 | 1.8 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 0.8 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 2.4 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Lower bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 1.1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2014 | 6.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2015 | 5.8 | 7.5 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2016 | 8.6 | 7.1 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2017 | 4.1 | 4.8 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2018 | 6.9 | 5.5 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2019 | 3.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2020 | 6.9 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 0 to 3 years | Upper bound 95% confidence interval | 2021 | 4.5 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 4 to 11 years | Value | 2014 | 0.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 4 to 11 years | Value | 2015 | 1.7 | 2.5 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 4 to 11 years | Value | 2016 | 1.3 | 3.0 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Age: 4 to 11 years | Value | 2017 | 1.2 | 2.7 | . | . | . | . | . | . |
Source: CBS. |
Dataset is not available.
This table contains data on the perceived state of health and on contacts with providers of medical care of the Dutch population in private households. These data can be grouped by several personal characteristics.
Data available for 2014-2021
Status of the data: final.
Changes as of July 31, 2023:
None, the table has been discontinued.
When will new data be published?
Not applicable. This table has been replaced, see paragraph 3 for a link to the new table.
Description topics
- Medical contacts
- Persons are asked if they had contact with their GP, specialist, dentist, dental hygienist, orthodontist, physiotherapist, exercise therapist, psychologist, psychotherapist or psychiatrist, and if he or she is treated by alternative healer. Also, if there were hospital admissions or day care admissions, if people have home care and if they had care abroad. Most questions after medical contacts are asked to persons of all ages. Contacts that do not often occur in the case of children are posed from an older age.
- Persons receiving home care
- Percentage of persons who receive paid help or care at home because of health problems. E.g. help in housekeeping, personal care, nursing, maternity care, or meal service (such as meals-on-wheels). By paid help is meant help paid by someone him/herself or an authority.
- Persons with care abroad
- Percentage of persons who in the 12 months preceding the interview used health care in a foreign country (i.e., not in the Netherlands). Examples are use of a GP, medical specialist, hospital or dentist.
- Informal care
- Informal care is care that a person receives from his or her acquaintances like a partner, friend or child, if this person is chronically ill, in need of help or disabled. Informal care can be keeping house, washing and getting dressed, keeping company, transport, financial matters, etcetera. Informal care is not paid care. A volunteer from a volunteer group is not an informal care giver.
- Informal care, 16 years or older
- Percentage of persons of 16 years or older receiving informal care
- Informal care receiver
- Percentage of persons of 16 years or older receiving informal care
- Hours of informal care per week
- The average number of hours of care received per week by an informal care receiver
- Informal care, 55 years or older
- Percentage of persons of 55 years or older receiving informal care
- Informal care receiver
- Percentage of persons of 55 years or older receiving informal care
- Hours of informal care per week
- The average number of hours of care received per week by an informal care receiver
- SF-12 health measure, age 12 or older
- The 'Short Format 12' or SF-12 questionnaire is a selection of 12 questions from the SF-36 (Ware et al., 1995 *). The SF-12 is a widely used international standard of a generic health measure. The SF-12 measures eight health aspects, namely physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, physical pain, general health, vitality (energy / fatigue), social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems and mental health. Based on the 12 questions, two partial scales can be calculated; a summary measure for physical health (norm score physical) and a summary measure for psychological health (norm score psychological).
These norm scores are calculated for people aged 12 or older.
*Ware J.E., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. SF-12: How to score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Second Edition, 1995.- Separate items
- Emotional problem: less carefully
- The following question was asked to respondents aged 12 or older:
When you are thinking about your work or other daily activities, have you not done your work or other activities as carefully as you are used to during the past 4 weeks due to an emotional problem (for example, feeling depressed or anxious)?
1.Yes
2. No.- Yes
- The percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered 'yes' to the question ‘If you are thinking about your work or other daily activities, did you have an emotional problem (for example, feeling depressed or anxious) in the past 4 weeks not done the work or other activities as carefully as you are used to?'
- No
- The percentage of people aged 12 or older who answered 'no' to the question 'If you are thinking about your work or other daily activities, did you have an emotional problem (for example, feeling depressed or anxious) in the past 4 weeks not done the work or other activities as carefully as you are used to?'